Wot? You no believe me?

this article was very confusing just by the opening title started off side ways but i realize this is how the whole article was going to be about. this was more of a free style argument or opinionated article i liked the article about the kid born in Hawaii just to see the difference in culture over there even though there still americans. but the first article somewhat appealed to me with the slang talk that really seemed like an average text message i get from my good friends everyday. thats why i feel the first article was intended for young African American group as bad a s that sounds. i didn't really know where these articles wear trying to go or what they were trying to accomplish though?

the first article seemed the most effective because it was something or a language i deal with everyday that friends or family talk like in text messaging. the hawaiian person was really interesting as well it was more of a story of someone's life instead of the text messaging example of my life. but they didn't really go into detail about the difference or why they had such a big difference in culture then over here in the states.

i thought the article about the ancestry of hawaiians arranged the genres to fit the overall argument the most there is a handicap when it comes to there language i never even heard of the pidgin language or pidgin english they call it but it was still hard to really understand the article ad what they were trying to get across to the audience.

i think the difference in these articles and the ones we looked at in class is the ones you gave us for the blogs seem more realist or something i would believe i didn't know these were made up.